• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • LuxeSwap Auctions will be ending soon!

    LuxeSwap is the original consignor for Styleforum, and has weekly auctions that show the diversity of our community, with hundreds lof starting at $0.99 every week, ending starting at 5:30 Eastern Time. Please take the time to check them out here. You may find something that fits your wardrobe exactly

    Good luck!

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Raj on the apprentice

LA Guy

Opposite Santa
Admin
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2002
Messages
57,813
Reaction score
36,693
I don't agree with most of you guys. What you call individuality, I call looking like a jackass. If he were auditioning for a job singing satirical political show tunes (The Flat Tax Rag), maybe. But just maybe.

The other guys looked sharp, albeit a bit conservative. Remember fellas, the clothes are supposed to make you look good, not the other way around.

I agree that Raj looked like a jackass. I disagree about the other guys looking sharp. They had bad suits, bad haircuts, and generally looked liked they wanted to be corporate drones, or at least want to play coroporate drones on t.v. One or both of these is true for all these contestants.

I also agree with the other poster's point about watchability, although, as in the case of Omarosa last year, at some point the wacky ones have to go if the show is to stay in the "reality" t.v. category.

Better than Mark Cuban's show anyway. That should've been named "Kissing Mark Cuban's ass for X number of weeks."
 

Andrew V.

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2004
Messages
402
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by montecristo#4,10 Sep. 2004, 2:25
... I Â should add that it is a little surprising that, after Omarossa's debacle last season, the only black woman they would choose for this season should turn out to be a total fruitcake (magic 8 ball notwithstanding)...
Unfortunately I am not surprised at all. Most reality shows cast a designated sassy sista'.
 

Featured Sponsor

Do You Have a Signature Fragrance?

  • Yes, I have a signature fragrance I wear every day

  • Yes, I have a signature fragrance but I don't wear it daily

  • No, I have several fragrances and rotate through them

  • I don't wear fragrance


Results are only viewable after voting.

Forum statistics

Threads
509,225
Messages
10,608,724
Members
224,872
Latest member
BrownUrge
Top